[BDSM-LegalIssues] Re: New book -- good but disturbing
Wow. I can only say, wow. I asked a question that is directly related
to the NCSF, to the position she holds there, and you are saying that
it's unfair? And given the supposed NCSF mission, you even defend
discriminating specifically against the San Diego Six (which she so
far has evaded answering)? Wow.
Even if she did work for a religious organization (which, by the way,
she didn't say - she said her company was owned by people of a
religious minority), she earlier claimed that her work life had
nothing to do with the NCSF. You can't have it both ways!
My question stands.
--- In BDSM-LegalIssues@
<msdomina@..
>
> I can see where an arrest like that of the San Diego Six would render
> them as being unfit to work in the religious organization where Leigha
> works. I think such a question is extremely unfair to pose to her.
>
> Domina
>
> cadenas_sd wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- In BDSM-LegalIssues@
> > <mailto:BDSM-
<leigha@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Good grief Jay.
> > >
> > > You have my permission to forward this thread (unclipped of course)
> > to Susan Wright (who isn't a board member) and anyone else you
> > > like on the NCSF board. Their email addresses can be found on our
> > website.
> > >
> > > I've never indicated once that I was speaking for NCSF.
> >
> > I think there may be a way to resolve this. Let's take both your
> > actual day job, and non-sexual crimes out of the equation. Let's also
> > remove your employer's policies from the discussion. We can also agree
> > that the actual legal situation permits this policy - Jay's (and my)
> > issue is whether it is appropriate.
> >
> > What is left is you *defending* these policies. And that may have
> > happened in the heat of the discussion.
> >
> > I'd like to reduce this to a few questions that I think extract all
> > the relevant information.
> >
> > Leigha, can you state unequivocally "I believe it is inappropriate for
> > employers to use any arrest for an allegation of a sexual offense to
> > make personnel decisions before a trial has been completed?"
> >
> > Can you state unequivocally that you will work towards law changes
> > that will outlaw using any arrest record for sexual offenses for
> > personnel decisions?
> >
> > Can you state unequivocally, regardless of your employer's actual
> > policies, that the NCSF, and you personally, believe that the arrest
> > records for the following people should not be used for any personnel
> > decisions:
> >
> > - The San Diego Six
> > - Genarlow Wilson
> > - Lawrence and Garner (of Lawrence v Texas)
> >
> > I certainly hope you can answer each of these questions with a single
> > unqualified "Yes" - and if you do, my faith in the NCSF would be
restored.
> >
> >
>
Post message: BDSM-LegalIssues@onelist.com
Subscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: BDSM-LegalIssues-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/BDSM-LegalIssues
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
posted by Annja Sue at
11:31 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home