Tuesday, January 8, 2008

[BDSM-LegalIssues] You did, didn't you, say the following, 'tongue in cheek', RIGHT? WAS: Re: New b

--- In BDSM-LegalIssues@yahoogroups.com, Duncan O'Neil
<master_carmichael@...> wrote:
>
> Seems to me Cadenas prefers the nanny-state over the responsible
> state.

I don't recall making any demands on the state at all...

But in all honesty, a Big Brother employer is considerably worse. At
least, the Constitution provides a recourse when the government tries
to interfere with our sexual lives.

If it had been Lawrence v Walmart instead of Lawrence v Texas,
Lawrence wouldn't have had any legal recourse. And since nearly all
employers act in the same way, "he can just find another job" is just
a canard.

__._,_.___
Community email addresses:
  Post message: BDSM-LegalIssues@onelist.com
  Subscribe:    BDSM-LegalIssues-subscribe@onelist.com
  Unsubscribe:  BDSM-LegalIssues-unsubscribe@onelist.com
  List owner:   BDSM-LegalIssues-owner@onelist.com

Shortcut URL to this page:
  http://www.onelist.com/community/BDSM-LegalIssues
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Moderator Central

Yahoo! Groups

Get the latest news

from the team.

Best of Y! Groups

Discover groups

that are the best

of their class.

Yahoo! Groups

Women of Curves

Discuss food, fitness

and weight loss.

.

__,_._,___

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home