Re: [BDSM-LegalIssues] Re: Canadians begin to get it...
All that high talk about how other venues have been able to "solve" the problem yet you very clearly say "I am not going to offer my knowledge." "You want to figure it out, go ahead figure it out. I already know but I will not tell." Real friendly, kind of like half the current Presidential candidates - saying they are going to change, yet never saying what will change.
Spanked Hubby <spankedhubby2005@
Unless, of course, you prefer it the way it is - and the vehemence of your arguments is evidence to just that.
And, to the Australian whiner :-] , your opinion is noted but that is all it is - just ask Malc here - it ain't a fact and I and others disagree that it is just simple economics.
S H
----- Original Message ----
From: Malcolm Weir <malc@gelt.org>
To: BDSM-LegalIssues@
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 8:12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [BDSM-LegalIssues] Re: Canadians begin to get it...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spanked Hubby
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:56 PM
> The Australian commentator was just a whining electoral
> loser! From what I know of Australia they are doing just
> fine there (other than fighting the USA caused global warming, eh).
Oh, well, that's fine then.
Of course, it does _rather_ weaken your argument to dismiss negative data as
just coming from "whining electoral losers".
I mean, I could just dismiss everything you say as just coming from someone
with a monstrous inferiority complex, so we can ignore what you write!
> Your jury award bogeyman has been exposed as that by other of
> your countrymen!
Err, that would include Cadenas, right? The guy whose grasp of dictionaries
leaves a lot to be desired? The guy who thinks discretion in hiring
decisions aggravates the problem?
You seem to be having grave difficulty with the concept of opinions being
different from facts...
> The difference between the Canadian and USA
> jury awards is not so huge as to be an absolute barrier.
Ah, you've snucked an "absolute" in. So you're admitting that it's a
barrier. You're beginning to understand.
> Discrimination in employment on the basis of gender and race
> and religion have survived your beloved First Ammendment - wonder why?
Because smarter people than you (not a short list) have realized that gender
and race are properties of being, not properties of doing.
And I'd be fine with a policy prohibiting discrimination on the basis of
sexual orientation or identity. But (as the US Supreme Court cite I
provided you) states, that's not the position now, and changing it may have
unintended and unfortunate additional consequences.
But "being arrested" is a property of doing.
> But, yeah, one thing you are right about is that you can't
> just copy something from another jurisdiction!
Great, so you can now shut up with your "here's how BC does it" thing, and
get back to the problem of a solution _for the USA_.
> S H
Malc.
Looking for a X-Mas gift? Everybody needs a Flickr Pro Account.
http://www.flickr.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Post message: BDSM-LegalIssues@onelist.com
Subscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: BDSM-LegalIssues-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/BDSM-LegalIssues
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
posted by Annja Sue at
4:46 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home