RE: [BDSM-LegalIssues] Re: New book -- good but disturbing
At 01:42 PM 1/4/2008, Malcolm Weir wrote:
>What you, and Wiseman, are so aggressively and stubbornly refusing to
>recognize is that there's no reason for a company to learn about an arrest
>_unless_ it leads to publicity,
Ummmmm. The assertion they ave been working on is that companies are
acquiring and using arrest records to make hire and fire decisions. The
methods being used are not clear but negative publicity (ore even
just publicity)
was not being considered in their arguments. Just the policy of discovering
arrest records and making decisions on those records.
>In either case, "the people" (including employers) have probable cause to
>believe that the crime has been committed!
Not exactly. That would be the DA acting on behalf of "the
people". If it were
the people we would not need messy things like trial by jury.
-Vicki-
Post message: BDSM-LegalIssues@onelist.com
Subscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: BDSM-LegalIssues-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/BDSM-LegalIssues
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
posted by Annja Sue at
5:52 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home