Re: [BDSM-LegalIssues] Re: New book -- good but disturbing
Another point I haven't seen made. The burden of proof for a personnel
action is significantly lower than in a criminal proceeding. I don't see
this coming up much in hiring decisions, but quite frequently in
terminations. Just because a DA chooses not to prosecute a case, does not
restrict the employer from taking action based on the same set of evidence
and in some cases a smaller set.
In its simplest form, if someone takes a swing at a supervisor, in most
cases they are fired. Again in most cases this may or may not result in an
arrest, and rarely will it result in a conviction.
We do background checks on 100% of the people we hire. Of the people chosen
to be hired, 15% wash out on the drug tests, about 5% due to falsification
of their application, and probably less than 1% due to other findings on the
background check. We are dealing primarily with professional and trades
people. The only difference with unskilled positions is there is a smaller
number rejected for falsification on the application.
Post message: BDSM-LegalIssues@onelist.com
Subscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: BDSM-LegalIssues-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/BDSM-LegalIssues
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
posted by Annja Sue at
11:22 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home