Re: [BDSM-LegalIssues] Re: New book -- good but disturbing
I understand, Jay's original comment... but unless there are specific discriminatory legal issues involved, I would agree an employer is free to hire or fire anyone he pleases. I have found that it's usually the deception about the arrests (conviction or not), not the arrests (or convictions) themselves that lead an employer to not hire or terminate.
We all make choices, some good, some bad. We live with the consequences of those choices. Employers make choices about who would best fit the situation based upon the choices an applicant has made. I make choices about who I am going to associate with. We all do. That is life.
Tatu
Vicki <vicki@rjhg.com> wrote: At 04:37 PM 1/1/2008, Tatu wrote:
>I own and operate an investigative company and do background
>investigations as a part of my day job. I personally find no problem
>with someone hiring or firing someone for criminal history issues.
Huh? I thought the discussion was arrests not convictions. If you are
not convicted how can you have a criminal history?
Jay is not arguing for hiring people that have been convicted (not at
this time anyway)
He is arguing for hiring people that have been arrested then released.
-Vicki-
------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Post message: BDSM-LegalIssues@onelist.com
Subscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: BDSM-LegalIssues-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/BDSM-LegalIssues
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home