Friday, January 11, 2008

RE: [BDSM-LegalIssues] Re: Vicki's codification attempt.

So you agree!

Vicki <vicki@rjhg.com> wrote:

Definition 2 seems most applicable. He was
aquitted. He was found "not guilty" in a court of law.
(Criminal court) That he was tried again in
civil court looks like double jeopardy to me but that
concept may only apply to Criminal Law. The fact
that Civil court has a much broader range of
acceptance of finding against, guilt nor
innocence of committing crimes not being involved,
makes for a big range of discussion points that
could keep us busy for a very long time.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Community email addresses:
  Post message: BDSM-LegalIssues@onelist.com
  Subscribe:    BDSM-LegalIssues-subscribe@onelist.com
  Unsubscribe:  BDSM-LegalIssues-unsubscribe@onelist.com
  List owner:   BDSM-LegalIssues-owner@onelist.com

Shortcut URL to this page:
  http://www.onelist.com/community/BDSM-LegalIssues
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! Groups

Latest product news

Join Mod. Central

stay connected.

Cat Groups

on Yahoo! Groups

Share pictures &

stories about cats.

Yahoo! Groups

Parenting Zone

Share experiences

with other parents.

.

__,_._,___

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home