Re: [BDSM-LegalIssues] You did, didn't you, say the following, 'tongue in cheek', RIGHT? WAS: Re: New b
Not unless your case is sensational enough. If you are just trying to live
your life and the US government screws you over your sexual lifestyle and
you have an unpopular background, nobody cares and nobody will help you.
Daniel
-------Original Message-----
From: cadenas_sd
Date: 1/8/2008 1:02:11 PM
To: BDSM-LegalIssues@
Subject: [BDSM-LegalIssues] You did, didn't you, say the following, 'tongue
in cheek', RIGHT? WAS: Re: New b
--- In BDSM-LegalIssues@
<master_carmichael@
>
> Seems to me Cadenas prefers the nanny-state over the responsible
> state.
I don't recall making any demands on the state at all...
But in all honesty, a Big Brother employer is considerably worse. At
least, the Constitution provides a recourse when the government tries
to interfere with our sexual lives.
If it had been Lawrence v Walmart instead of Lawrence v Texas,
Lawrence wouldn't have had any legal recourse. And since nearly all
employers act in the same way, "he can just find another job" is just
a canard.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Post message: BDSM-LegalIssues@onelist.com
Subscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: BDSM-LegalIssues-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/BDSM-LegalIssues
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
posted by Annja Sue at
5:37 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home