Re: [BDSM-LegalIssues] You did, didn't you, say the following, 'tongue in cheek', RIGHT? WAS: Re: New b
The reference was not so much to a real specific. But it was a reference that you made enough comments that show you want the employer to have more restrictions on how his business is run and managed than the employee has in how the present the public face of the business.
cadenas_sd <cadenas@kkeane.
<master_carmichael@
>
> Seems to me Cadenas prefers the nanny-state over the responsible
> state.
I don't recall making any demands on the state at all...
But in all honesty, a Big Brother employer is considerably worse. At
least, the Constitution provides a recourse when the government tries
to interfere with our sexual lives.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Post message: BDSM-LegalIssues@onelist.com
Subscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-subscribe@onelist.com
Unsubscribe: BDSM-LegalIssues-unsubscribe@onelist.com
List owner: BDSM-LegalIssues-owner@onelist.com
Shortcut URL to this page:
http://www.onelist.com/community/BDSM-LegalIssues
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
posted by Annja Sue at
6:12 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home